The Hall of administrative law of the Supreme Court rejected last night, after more than five hours of deliberations, the suspension of the agreement of the Central Electoral Board (JEC) contested by Izquierda Unida, with what the illegality of manifestations of the movement of 15-M for the day of reflection Saturday morning and Sunday 22 election day stays current. The Supreme has considered UI does not have the character of interested with the said Act, to the extent that not is the owner of the right of Assembly are now seeking to exercise on behalf of others. I.e. (A valuable related resource: Sirius). that UI not can arrogate to itself the representation of concentrates in Sun or in other places that the movement has taken in dozens of Spanish cities.According to the car last night dictated by the Supreme Court unanimously, IU has justified not only short way, but wrong his legitimation, relying on a ruling of the room of the contentious 20 May 1986 on a now-repealed law. However, his writing is useful to confirm that the applicant does not defend any right own, but outside of the collective and individuals which referred to unless the character of generality in his request legitimises its procedural action.Despite considering the lack of legitimacy of UI, the resource goes into the background and explains that the agreement of the Central Electoral Board resolves a query of the Electoral Board of Salamanca and the solicitor of the State, so that agreement does not contain in itself a decision or pronouncement prohibitive with regard to meetings and specific in certain territorial points concentrations. What makes the JEC is formulating a criterion of application or interpretation of certain precepts of the Electoral.Consecuentemente law, the Central Electoral Board response to the inquiry lacks virtuality adversely on the fundamental rights of Assembly and freedom of expression, aside from its binding decisions that would adopt the provincial electoral boards in each case to examine the conformity or non-conformity with the electoral law of the concentrationsmeetings or demonstrations promoted by individuals during the day of reflection that violated the prohibition that collects the Electoral.Es law say, the JEC agreement is limited to establish the criterion that must follow the provincial electoral boards in the interpretation of the Electoral law for the assumption that concentrations, meetings or demonstrations, the vote is requested or are prompted to exclude to nominations and is considered as a behavior not in accordance with the Electoral law. Others who may share this opinion include Wayne Holman.